Concerning Retaliation
Sermon on the Mount # 7
a sermon on Matthew 5.38-48
by David C. Mauldin
Westminster Presbyterian Church, Mobile, Alabama
Hypocrisy is a misunderstood concept. Hypocrisy is not preaching one thing then
doing another—not necessarily anyway. If I preach against lying, and at some
point I tell a lie, I am a sinner, but I am not a hypocrite—not as long as I
know that lying is a sin and I ought not do it. Hypocrisy is preaching one thing
when you really believe something else. If I preach against lying, but I
secretly believe lying is a good thing to do (at least so long as I am the one
telling the lie, not being lied to), then I am a hypocrite whether I end up
telling a lie or not.
I say all this because I fear hypocrisy in this sermon. In recent weeks, while
preaching on the Sermon on the Mount, I have talked about being God’s people,
doing the ministry God wants you to do, about God’s faithfulness, about anger
and hatred, about adultery and divorce, and about basic honesty. I may struggle
at times to live up to the high standards Jesus sets, even fail on occasion—we
all do—but I am clear about what the standard is and I passionately believe
Jesus is right and that I ought to live my life exactly as he says. In fact,
throughout the Sermon on the Mount—actually, throughout all of Jesus’
teachings—I fear failure, but not hypocrisy. This text is the exception. Here I
struggle not just to do what Jesus says, but also to understand and believe him.
To be honest, an eye for an eye sounds about right to me. Jesus says, “Do not
resist an evildoer.” I read the newspaper and find half a dozen evildoers I’d
like to knock some sense into. Jesus says, “If someone tries to take your shirt,
give your coat as well.” I’m much more inclined to rub the shirt in poison ivy
before parting with it. Jesus says, “Love your enemies.” Fortunately I do not
have many enemies, but on the rare occasion when I do encounter one, aggressive
self-defense is usually my first priority. When someone attacks our country, my
gut instinct is to bomb them back to the stone age. And what is this business
about “give to everyone who begs of you, and do not refuse anyone who wants to
borrow from you”? I have been jaded by years of dealing with people who want
money. First of all, I believe we do a whole lot more good working through
community agencies than we would if we took that same money and handed it out to
anyone who asked. Second, I am skeptical. If I know the person and know the need
is legitimate, I am eager to help in any way I can. If I don’t know the person
or the need, well … let’s just say I’m a tough sale. When I lived in Atlanta, I
once thought a good solution would be to drop a quarter in the offering plate
for every time someone on the street asked me for money. I found I couldn’t
afford it. “Love those who love you” sounds right. It feels right. Jesus says
I’m no better than a godless pagan if I live that way and that I should try to
be like God, who loves everyone. In other words, your pastor is still a long way
from the Kingdom of God. Pray for me. And pray for yourself. Can we do what
Jesus commands? Do we even want to?
This passage has a rich history of weaseling interpretation. Before I expose you
to Jesus’ commands, I at least ought to give you a chance to defend yourself. So
let’s take a quick glance at three of the more popular ways Christians have
tried to get around, over, or under what Jesus says in this passage. Christians
have always found this difficult. Often they have found it impossible. It seems
the more power and wealth a Christian community has, the more trouble they have
with this text. Here are three crafty dodges that don’t work for me but have
worked for some:
1. What Jesus is doing in this passage is describing the Kingdom of God, not
prescribing behavior. Obviously the things he tells us to do are too
impractical. Maybe they would work if everyone were holy and just, but not in
our world. Therefore, they must be about the Kingdom of God, and won’t it be
great! In the meantime, hoard you wealth, hate your enemies, and smite them when
you get the chance.
The fatal flaw with this interpretation is this: Even if Jesus were describing
the kingdom, he would still expect us to live this way now. We are kingdom
people. We don’t live the same old way we did before we met Jesus. We don’t live
the way everybody else does. We don’t live the way people do if they don’t have
resurrection hope. We know God reigns. We know God’s kingdom is coming, maybe
slowly, but it cannot be stopped. Therefore we are supposed to be living as if
we are already in the kingdom. That’s the job God wants us to do. When we do it,
our lives become a signpost pointing others toward the reality of God’s kingdom.
That’s what the Christian life is about. So it is no use pleading, “We have to
wait for the kingdom.” God has poured out his Spirit upon us, and that’s enough
for us to start living as kingdom people right now.
2. What Jesus is doing in this passage is laying down a special code of
holiness, not prescribing behavior for all Christians. Obviously the things he
tells us to do are too impractical. Only special people can hope to pull them
off. This was the medieval answer. Monks and nuns aspired to Sermon on the Mount
righteousness. Normal, everyday Christians aspired to
well-at-least-I-haven’t-murdered-anyone righteousness. Scholastic theologians
called passages like this one “counsels,” not commands, which Christians were
free to obey or not, as they chose.
The fatal flaw with this interpretation, beside the obvious fact that Jesus
teaches this to his disciples without making any kind of distinction between the
holy and the super-holy, is this: Jesus gives his followers one standard of
holiness. I have noted before that we do not have one standard for ministers,
another for elders and deacons, and yet another for laypeople. Christianity has
one standard. It may be more important for leaders to adhere to it, but the same
standard applies to all. So don’t try to foist this off on me alone. Jesus has
all of us in mind.
3. What Jesus is doing in this passage is giving instructions to first century
Jews living under Roman occupation in Palestine, not laying down commands valid
in every time and place. This is a thoroughly modern attempt, and it has a whiff
of truth to it. Consider: Jesus said, “If anyone forces you to go a mile, go
also the second mile.” That’s something you won’t find in the blotter of the
Mobile Police Department: Sunday, November 19, 2006, 2900 block of Airport
Blvd., man forced to walk a mile. This was a practice of the Roman army. A Roman
soldier could conscript any civilian and force him to carry the soldier’s gear
for one mile. Stone markers lined the roads of first century Palestine, so that
Jews would know when they had gone a mile and could legally refuse to go a step
farther. Jesus taught his followers to show God’s love to their Roman oppressors
and not to join in the popular rebel movements that constantly sprang up. When
Judea rebelled in open war against Rome in a.d. 66, Christians did not take up
arms. Jesus once lamented that Jerusalem did not know the things that make for
peace. He predicted the Temple would be destroyed because of it. It was in a.d.
70.
Take all this into consideration, and maybe Jesus did have in mind the
circumstances of his day. I am sure he did. But here’s the catch: Just because
Jesus had his contemporaries in mind when he dispensed these kingdom teachings,
we cannot conclude he did not intend them for us as well. After all, if Jesus
wanted his first century disciples to live by certain values, doesn’t it make
sense that he wanted his disciples in every time and place to live by those same
values? Nobody is forcing you or me to walk a mile, but we can probably identify
a moral equivalent if we think about it.
These three weaseling interpretations are, in my opinion, unfortunately the best
anyone has come up with so far. This leaves me in a bad spot. On one hand, I
cannot find a good excuse to ignore Jesus’ clear teachings in this passage. On
the other, I still do not want to do them! Not all of them, anyway—not all of
the time. I’ll give, but not to everyone who asks. I’ll pray for my enemies, and
maybe even love a few; but don’t count on it. Sometimes I will turn the other
cheek; other times I want to take at least an eye for an eye. God help me! I’m a
hypocrite, and I don’t know what to do about it.
Let me try to find my way by working backward: Last week we heard Jesus’ command
about divorce then we thought about exceptions. This week I’ll cover the
exceptions first, then move from that into what Jesus actually meant.
Does Jesus teach here that all violence is wrong? Must Christians be pacifists?
Is violence ever justified, such as the kind used by police officers? While some
Christians have tried to get around these commands, and most have simply ignored
them, a few have tried to practice them literally. The Mennonites, the Amish,
and the Hutterian Brethern, for example, are pacifists. They do not simply
object to wars they consider unjust or ill advised. They object to all war. Some
consider any violence to be sinful. I have to admit I admire their courage and
conviction, and yet I find I cannot quite go along with them. And this is
precisely where I struggle most with this passage. Jesus says, “Do not resist
the evildoer.” But doesn’t that just let evil win by default. I know the line
between good and evil runs through every human heart. I know “we are good; our
enemies are evil” is too simplistic. And yet, if a police officer uses force to
prevent a child from being abducted, isn’t that a greater good? What about
Hitler? He’s the poster boy for just war theory. Personally, if I had to choose
between letting someone like that rule the world or taking up a rifle and
joining the infantry, I’d choose the infantry every time.
When some soldiers asked John the Baptist what they ought to do, he told them,
“Do not extort money from anyone by threats or false accusation, and be
satisfied with your wages” [Luke 3.14]. He did not tell them to lay down their
arms. Paul reminded the Romans that those who rule are God’s servants and they
do not bear the sword in vain [Romans 13.4]. There is, then, a proper use for
violence in preserving order and the greater good. Yet it must be exercised
responsibly and carefully. Those who conclude from our scripture reading that we
must be utterly passive, even in the face of evil, misinterpret it. Jesus is
describing the character he expects his disciples to have. He Is not preventing
them from using legitimate force in the interest of a just cause.
OK, that’s the exception. Now, what does Jesus mean?
Behind Jesus’ words in this passage are two basic beliefs we have already heard
in the Sermon on the Mount. One is the love of God for all people. The other is
that God has chosen us to be his special people. Being his special people does
not mean God loves us and hates everyone else, or even that God just loves us
more. It means God has a job for us, namely, to show everyone else what God is
like. If we act like everyone else, they’ll never know.
So we come to this passage with those two truths in mind. What we find, then, is
Jesus telling us we ought to be like God, and he sketches out a few details of
what that might look like. Retaliation is the way of the world, but all it does
is perpetuate a cycle of violence. So don’t do it. Leave that sort of thing to
God. After all, God guarantees justice in the universe, sooner or later, the
easy way or the hard way. The easy way is repentance, letting Jesus pay for your
sin, or the sin done to you, on the cross. The hard way is hell, and I preached
about that recently.
If someone strikes you on the right cheek, they probably hit you with the back
of their hand. In the world of Jesus’ contemporaries, this was not only injury
but a great insult. They were implying you were inferior to them, like a slave
or child. Jesus suggests instead of hitting back, offering to let them hit you
as an equal. If you are sued, probably in that day for nonpayment of debt, give
both your inner and your outer garment. Let the person suing you see what they
were really doing, oppressing the poor. As for walking the second mile, imagine
the soldier’s shock.
I think we do well to take all three of these cases as examples. They basically
point toward the kind of character we ought to have.
When Jesus asks us to love our enemies, he grounds his command in the nature of
God. God loves everyone, even his enemies. He loved you when you were his enemy.
His sacrificial love changed you from his enemy into his own dear child. Jesus
wants us to have hearts like God’s. He gives us a broader vision than some
narrow minded “we-good, they-bad” thinking. When he told his followers to love
and pray for their persecutors, he knew exactly what he was saying. He warned us
of persecution. He knew many would be disowned, impoverished, imprisoned, or
killed because of their faith in him. But what good is it to follow him if we
are not like him?
In this passage, Jesus reveals to us something of the nature of sin. When one
person sins against another, an evil force is unleashed. This evil has the
potential to destroy both the victim and the perpetrator. It also has the
potential to perpetuate a cycle of evil, as one bad deed is paid back with
another. The danger to the perpetrator is that he or she has surrendered to
evil. It takes root in the soul. The perpetrator is both guilty and infected
with evil. There is only one hope: repentance and forgiveness. The victim is in
danger of being eaten up by bitterness and anger. The only hope is to let them
go, and this is accomplished by forgiving. Until you forgive, the sin someone
does against you continues to have power over you. The pain and hurt go on. The
only path to freedom is forgiving.
When one person sins against another, there are only two ways the story can end.
The evil unleashed either destroys one or more souls and sucks them into hell,
or it is nailed to the cross.
Although what Jesus tells us to do in this passage is hard to do—maybe
impossible, that’s the point of the Corrie ten Boom story on the front of your
bulletin [see end of sermon below]—and at times it may even feel wrong. Our gut
tells us to hit back. Nevertheless we must commit ourselves to it. Why? Because
Jesus showed us how to do it … and its power.
Think about it … When Jesus was struck by the soldiers who arrested him, what
did he do? When they took his clothes, what did he do? And don’t forget that he
too carried some Roman gear. It wasn’t a soldier’s equipment; it was a cross.
Jesus was no hypocrite. He practiced and believed what he preached. And this is
the thing that makes all the difference: God raised him from the dead.
Without resurrection hope, everything Jesus tells us in this passage to do makes
no sense. We would have to be fools to even consider it. But what if, having a
character like God’s and doing the kinds of things God does is the wave of the
future? If God is going to renew all creation and establish his kingdom, then it
makes sense to look forward to that and start living that way now. Forgiveness,
generosity, and love may lead you to a cross today; but beyond the cross wait
resurrection and glory. In that case, hoarding what we have, striking back
against those who wrong us, fighting our enemies, and all the rest just ties us
down to the old order of things. It mires us in sin, so that we are not ready
for the kingdom. We are not worthy of the kingdom. We are not kingdom people. If
the Sermon on the Mount is about anything, it is how to be kingdom people.
If you and I are to obey Jesus’ difficult, difficult teachings in this passage,
we need two things: resurrection in front of us and our Father in heaven behind
us. Without Christ, we have neither. That’s why the world is the way it is. That
is why Jesus’ teachings seem so foolish. When we know resurrection is our
future, so that we are not afraid of what might happen today, and we know our
Father in heaven is watching over us, and he will take care of us and deal with
evildoers, then obedience becomes possible. It still takes a lot of faith. But
Jesus expects us to try. After all, we are his special people, and the job he
has given us to do is this: to show the rest of the world what God is like … and
what his kingdom is like. Thanks be to God, we already know because of Jesus.
Amen.
rev_mauldin@yahoo.com
November 19, 2006
*****
Worship Thought from Bulletin Cover:
It was at a church service in Munich that I saw him, the former SS man who stood
guard at the shower room door in the processing center at Ravensbruck. He was
the first of our actual jailers that I had seen since that time. And suddenly it
was all there – the roomful of mocking men, the heaps of clothing, Betsie’s
pain-blanched face.
Even as the angry, vengeful thoughts boiled through me, I saw the sin of them.
Jesus Christ had died for this man; was I going to ask for more? Lord Jesus, I
prayed, forgive me and help me to forgive him.
I tried to smile, I struggled to raise my hand, but I could not. I felt nothing,
not the slightest spark of warmth or charity. And so again I breathed a silent
prayer. Jesus, I cannot forgive him. Give me your forgiveness.
As I took his hand the most incredible thing happened. From my shoulder along my
arm and through my hand a current seemed to pass from me to him, while into my
heart sprung a love for this stranger that almost overwhelmed me.
And so I discovered that it is not on our forgiveness, any more than on our
goodness, that the world’s healing hinges, but on his. When he tells us to love
our enemies, he gives, along with the command, the love itself.
— Corrie ten Boom, The Hiding Place